Historic Huguenot Street logo

Where History Continues to be Written

in New Paltz, New York
the heart of the Hudson Valley


View Our Newsletter
Enews Sign Up
Donate Now Search

Another House On Huguenot Street:
The Discovery of the Dubois-Elting House

Kenneth Shefsiek, Curator of Education, Huguenot Historical Society
August 2001; updated February 2002

It has long been believed that of the stone houses built by the patentees and their children in the center of the historic Village of New Paltz, all but one survives [the house of Simon LeFevre, originally built in the "northern part of the present churchyard" stood only until the Greek Revival church was built in 1839. Ralph LeFevre, History of New Paltz, New York and Its Old Families 2nd ed. (Albany, NY: Fort Orange Press, 1909) 411]. It has recently been discovered, however, that there was an additional early stone house, that of Patentee Abraham DuBois, located between the Abraham Hasbrouck House and what is now the library of the Huguenot Historical Society.

During the summer of 2000, it came to the attention of SUNY New Paltz Professor Joe Diamond that there might have been an additional house on Huguenot Street, at one time owned by the Elting family, located near the Abraham Hasbrouck House. This information was derived from the 1790 Federal census which indicated that Ezekiel Elting (1763-1842) resided between his father Roeloff J. Elting (1737-1795) (in the Bevier-Elting House) and Isaias Hasbrouck (in the Abraham Hasbrouck House). On the last day of Dr. Diamond's 2000 Field School, portions of a foundation were found in just that location. Since it was the last day of the season, further investigation was postponed until 2001. In August 2001, the boundaries of the original structure were discovered. The foundations indicate that the house was approximately 37' x 17.5', indicating that it probably consisted of two rooms. As of 1798, the house was no longer in existence, and Dr. Diamond theorizes that the building was "robbed," meaning that the stones were taken away to be used for other purposes. Through an analysis of estate and legal papers, a partial history of the house and lot has been developed.

When Abraham DuBois (1657-1731), son of Louis DuBois, who had become a New Paltz Patentee at the age of 21, died on October 7, 1731, he willed "myn huyse Schuer en Ewe in het dorp van de Paltz" ("my houses, barn and lot in the village of Paltz"), to his second surviving son, Joel [Will, Abraham DuBois, (I) October 1, 1731, trans. Gustave Anjou, Ulster Couny, NY Probate Records, vol. 1 (New York: Published by the Author, 1906) 116]. He does not indicate the location of the house in his will, but generally the terms "village" or "town" were used in 18th-century New Paltz documents in connection with what is now Huguenot Street as distinct from elsewhere in the patent. Additionally, it is logical that Abraham had a house on the street, since he was one of the patentees. Fortunately, the location is confirmed in a later document. Joel DuBois (1703-1734) died soon after his father in June of 1734, and being that he was unmarried and died intestate, his only brother Abraham DuBois, Jr.(1685-1758) became the owner of Joel's property. As Abraham had relocated to Somerset County, New Jersey, as early as 1718, he had no need for the property, so on June 7, 1735, he sold to his brother-in-law Roeloff Elting (1689-1746/7) (Roeoloff was married to Abraham Jr.'s sister Sarah) "an other Lott being the house or home Lott late of the said Abraham Dubois Deceased being bounded to the west by the Street to the North by the home Lott of Daniel Hasbrouck" (i.e., Abraham Hasbrouck house), "to the South by the home Lott of Samuel Bevier" (i.e., Bevier-Elting House) and to the East by the Land of Andries La ffever [Indenture, Abraham DuBois (II) and Roeloff Elting, June 7, 1735. Roelof J. and Ezekiel Elting Family Papers. Unpublished MSS Collection, Huguenot Historical Society of New Paltz, NY, Inc. This statement is somewhat confusing, since it refers to houses in the plural and lot in the singular. Since the house lots were fairly small, it does not seem possible that there could have been more than one house on a single lot. It has been suggested that Abraham DuBois' house burned in a fire (William and Ruth P. Heidgerd, "The Elting Family" Unpublished MSS, 1989, but the source of this assertion cannot be located. According to Joe Diamond, the archeologist who discovered the foundation, there does not appear to be any evidence of a fire.}]. (Andries LeFevre was the son of Simon LeFevre the patentee. Andries' son Simon, husband of Petronella Hasbrouck, later inherited the LeFevre property mentioned in this quote.) In the same indenture, Abraham DuBois also sold to Roeloff Elting "an other home Lott being bounded to the West by the street aforesaid to the North by the Lott of Daniel DuBois to the South by the home Lott of Abraham Diljo" (Deyo) "and to the East by the lott of Andries La ffever." This latter statement has several implications to be discussed later, but at this point suffice it to say that since two house lots were being sold, it is unclear from this document alone which lot contained Patentee Abraham DuBois' house. However, since both archeological evidence and the 1790 census indicate a house on the northerly lot and no evidence suggests the existence of a house on the southerly lot at any time, the northerly lot presumably marks the location of the Abraham DuBois house. Additionally, concerning the northerly lot, it is referred to as the "house or home lott" while the southern lot is simply the "house lott." The use of the word "home" might indicate the existence of the house.

In Roeloff Elting's will of October 29, 1745, it states "To my son Josiah" (1712-1784) "all those lots in the Patent of New Paltz which I have purchased of my brother-in-law Abraham DuBois, with the dwelling house and now in his occupation" (Anjou, 136-138). It is likely that Roeloff purchased the house in 1735 specifically for Josiah, as on February 4, 1726/7, Roeloff had purchased land "now in possession of the said Roelif Elting, together with the house, barn, orchards, pastures and all and every thing appurtenances" from Solomon and Louis (Jr.) DuBois (children of Louis Dubois) located on both the west and east sides of the "Paltz Kil on the grant" (LeFevre, 314-5). According to LeFevre, Roeloff was living on the land purchased from Solomon and Louis Jr. in his later years, but the deed of sale quoted suggested he moved there much earlier ( LeFevre, 483. LeFevre also states that Roeloff first settled in New Paltz around 1720, living in house located next to what is now called the Abraham Hasbrouck House, but as that house probably could not have been available even for rental until 1731 upon Abraham DuBois Sr.'s death, at which point Roeloff already owned land elsewhere in the patent, it is unlikely that he ever lived in the Abraham DuBois house under discussion. As to whether or not Roeloff was living in New Paltz prior to his purchase of the Solomon and Louis Jr. Dubois lands is unknown.). Roeloff's later will of January 1747 again confers the lots purchased from Abraham DuBois Jr. to his son Josiah, including both the house lot and empty lot next to the Deyo House.

If Roeloff did indeed purchase the old Abraham DuBois house specifically for Josiah, Josiah would follow suit in 1760, when he purchased from the heirs of Samuel Bevier "All that the said Dwelling House, Barn, Garden, yard, and the home lot unto the same belonging, scituate living and being in the New Paltz town aforesaid on the east side of the street in said town, being bounded to the west by said street, to the North by a lot of said Josiah Elting, to the east by a lot of Petronella Lefevre" (inherited from husband Simon from his father Andries from his father Simon) and to the south by a lot of Simon Dubois" (Indenture, the heirs of Samuel Bevier and Josiah Elting, May 12, 1760, Elting Family Papers). He subsequently rented this house in 1762 to his son Roeloff Josiah Elting,, which was already in Roeloff Josiah possession at the rate of one penny a year for ten years (Indenture, Josiah Elting and R. Josia Elting, December 22, 1762, Elting Family Papers). The house being referenced is now called the Bevier-Elting House, and according to tradition, the west room had been rented to the Eltings for use as a store around 1740. The house remained officially in the ownership of Josiah until his death in 1784 when it passed to Roeloff Josiah, even though Roeloff Josiah had been living in it as early as 1762 (this type of arrangement is suggestive of a certain type of land ownership, i.e., fathers purchasing land for sons although not transferring ownership until the father's death). This situation also helps to account for Josiah being the wealthiest man in New Paltz in 1765 (LeFevre, 94-6). R.oeloff. Josiah left the Bevier-Elting House to his sons Roeloff (1774-1819) and John (1773-1827) although their mother, Maria (1738-1800) was granted the right to live there (Indenture, Maria Elting and John and Roeloff Elting, Undated, Elting Family Papers).

Concerning the former Abraham DuBois house during this period, it seems to drop from the record between its rental to Josiah Elting in 1762 and the 1790 Census when it is indicated that Ezekiel Elting was residing there (Presumably Ezekiel was given the opportunity to live in the house as eldest son of R. Josiah who lived in the Bevier-Elting House. It is not clear when Ezekiel moved into the house, but his grandfather Josiah died in 1784 when Ezekiel was 21. Ezekiel married his first-cousin Magdalene in 1787.). Only one house is mentioned in Josiah's will of 1767 (Will, April 4, 1767, Josiah Elting, Elting Family Papers ) (the Bevier-Elting House), but that was the home in which Roeloff Josiah was living, so presumably Josiah was still living in the house purchased for him by his father (the Abraham DuBois House). While the A. DuBois house was occupied in 1790 by Ezekiel, as stated previously, a copy of the 1795 probate of Roeloff Josiah (he died intestate), refers to the "House or Homestead Lot late of Abraham Dubois deced" and the "Homestead and Lot" of the former Bevier property, both of which went to Roeloff and John (Undated manuscript, Elting Family Papers). The last mention of the house is in the 1798 U.S. Direct Tax which indicates "1 old Dwelling house of stone and frame used for a Granary or stone house age 113 yr." (Presumably the stone house had a wood frame addition, possibly to the rear.) Interestingly enough, the owner is recorded as Ezekiel Elting and the occupants are Roeloff and John (his brothers), even though Roeloff and John apparently received the house through the probating of their father's estate. (The 1798 tax list indicates that Ezekiel is living in a house he was renting from Jacob Hasbrouck, Jr., elsewhere in the patent.) The assessment also indicates that Ezekiel is operating a 20' x 15' "situate at the South end of Paltz town joining Jacob Hasbrouck" owned by the "Proprietors of Paltz Patent," presumably the site on which Ezekiel built his new house the following year. Since the old Abraham DuBois house had been "robbed" of its stones, it is conceivable that it was done so by Ezekiel himself to construct his new house. Additionally, the 1798 U.S. Direct Tax assessment indicates that the lot next to the Deyo House, purchased by Roeloff, conferred to his son Josiah and then to his son Roeloff Josiah, was in the possession of Ezekiel.

Since he reused materials, this might also shed light on why only part of the south wall of the 1799 House is of brick; i.e., he ran out of reused stone. One more intriguing aspect of the 1798 tax listing is that the entry had been crossed out in the original document and no valuation was given. Although it is difficult to ascertain why this was done, one possible reason is that although the house was originally included in the survey, by the time the tax record was submitted, it had been torn down, and so the entry was crossed out. This scenario would coincide with the traditional date of 1799 for the Ezekiel Elting (LeFevre) House.

The research on the DuBois-Elting house also uncovered the fact the current layout of the house lots on the east side of the street was originally intended to be denser than that which survives today, as evidence in several of the Elting deeds indicate that two additional house lots had been planned although apparently never built upon (at least no stone houses were built on them) between the Bevier-Elting House and the Deyo House. The existence of additional house lots helps to clarify why the Bevier-Elting house might have been erected with the gable-end to the street, a typical feature of urban Dutch architecture, the goal of which is to conserve street frontage. Looking at the houses that survive, it seems that it would have been unnecessary for the Beviers to have constructed their house in that manner, but given that a denser village was conceived, their choice seems more logical. No additional house lots have been discovered on the west side of the street, but because of the dropoff behind the western lots, they might have been wider and less deep.

The most exciting historical note uncovered in researching the DuBois-Elting House, however, is the indication that it was 113 years old in 1798, resulting in a construction date of 1685, about ten years before the houses were believed to have been built! While it is true that the date is not necessarily exact, it is the earliest known reference to a construction date so far uncovered. Additionally "113" in no way sounds arbitrary, suggesting that at least in 1798 it was believed to have been accurate. Furthermore, since Abraham was one of the youngest patentees, it is likely that he was not the first to build his house, suggesting that some of the other houses were built even earlier. Since tradition has indicated that the houses we built in the 1690s but were possibly constructed even a decade earlier, this was an extremely significant find.